When configuring Dante switches for redundant networks, how should the primary and secondary networks be organized?

When configuring Dante switches for redundant networks, organizing the primary and secondary networks in separate broadcast domains is crucial for optimal performance and reliability. Each broadcast domain can be thought of as a segment of the network where all devices can communicate with each other without needing a router. In the case of Dante networks, separating the primary and secondary networks ensures that they do not interfere with each other, particularly in terms of broadcast traffic and potential congestion.

By keeping the primary and secondary networks isolated in separate broadcast domains, you enhance redundancy and fault tolerance. If one network experiences issues, the other can still operate independently without being affected by the same broadcast traffic or failure points. This separation also helps in maintaining a clear and organized management structure for the network, allowing for more straightforward troubleshooting and maintenance.

Moreover, redundancy is critical in audio-over-IP applications where consistent and uninterrupted audio streams are necessary. Having separate broadcast domains minimizes risks of loops and other network complications that could arise if the networks were interconnected.

In contrast, organizing both networks in the same broadcast domain or linking them as one VLAN could create unnecessary complications, such as potential traffic congestion or network loops, which could negate the benefits of having a redundant setup. Additionally, configuring only the primary network would leave the system vulnerable to single points